One state is taking fuel efficiency into its own hands. The Mississippi legislature cut the Public Safety Commission’s budget, and now the department has to find ways to save money. And apparently they have – by limiting the number of miles state troopers can travel.
I realize times are tough all over, and I’m all for saving money and finding ways to cut fuel costs, but is this measure going a little too far? Each trooper can now travel only 2,500 in his or her territory per month, which is down from 5,000 miles per month.
Will cutting fuel costs affect our safety?
Yes, it will save money on fuel costs, and I’m sure it could be argued that it’s better for the vehicles (less wear and tear), but is it the best thing for public safety? I’m picturing high-speed chases where a state trooper is closing the gap, gaining on the bad guys, and suddenly his odometer rolls over and he realizes he can drive no farther. Does he just park his vehicle, throw his hands up and wait for a cab? Or will there be areas that are rarely patrolled due to mileage limits that become havens for criminals? Will the roadways become the Autobahns of America? Ok, maybe my ideas are a little extreme, but you get the idea.
I completely support our country’s law enforcement. They have tough jobs to do, often with little or no reward, credit or thanks. But there’s got to be a better way for the Mississippi State Troopers (and all state troopers) to reduce fuel costs. If you have any ideas, I’d love to hear ‘em. Until then, be careful in Mississippi, my friends.
{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }
Have to keep the $$$ in the fire & police & rescue safety to perform 7×24, now question about it!